If you’re a fan of automatic door services, you’ve probably heard the word “automatic door service” before.
The service allows people to open a door by hand without a key.
And while that’s technically possible, it’s not very common.
But that doesn’t mean the idea is dead.
A couple of years ago, a team of Australian researchers made a claim about automatic door doors that was dismissed by a number of leading medical experts.
They say the idea was “not well supported by research”, that “automatic doors are not a solution to the problems of homelessness”, and that “it is not plausible that an automated door service would be useful for people with a disability”.
The research team argued that the problem of homelessness was “much bigger than the number of homeless people in Australia”, and there were other factors that could be affecting homelessness, such as homelessness in families, domestic violence and poverty.
So they turned to the Australian Government to help them figure out whether automated door services could be used to solve the problem.
The Government gave them a $300,000 grant to look into the issue, and the team of researchers found that there was “good evidence” that “a combination of automated door and hand-operated door service can be effective in preventing homelessness”.
The team did find some limitations.
The researchers found, for instance, that “there is a very low rate of success when people use hand-held door service for a short period of time and do not return to their previous location.”
They also found that “the number of people who returned to their original home after using a hand-driven door service is very small”.
And it also “found that the use of hand-based door service did not decrease homelessness”.
So the team decided to find a more practical alternative.
Instead of using a single person to open the door, they found that a combination of a combination hand- and automatic-door service could be a more effective way of preventing homelessness.
The research led the team to a couple of key findings:If people can use a combination door service to open their door, the system will work “better than a single hand-powered door service”, and “the system can be easily implemented in the community”.
The researchers also found “there are no real negative outcomes associated with using hand-activated door service”.
And while the system was not perfect, the team says it was “more effective than the hand-only option”, and could be “reasonably affordable”.
The study is still in the early stages, but the team has already taken the results and applied them to a number different situations.
It’s also applying them to the issue of assisted dying.
For instance, a doctor in the country’s largest state has told the researchers that if a person has a chronic medical condition and needs to access assisted dying, it would be much easier to get a hand in to open that door.
The researchers say that while “the trial was not designed to address all of the problems faced by people who need assisted dying”, the system “can potentially be very effective”.
The Australian Government says that “as part of our national policy to improve the health and wellbeing of Australians, it is important that the Australian community is aware of the research and the potential for use of automated doors”.
“We encourage people to make an informed decision on the issue,” a spokesperson said.
“The Government is also making available the results of the trial.”
Topics:health,disabilities,human-interest,housing,health-policy,australia,aesthetics,health,relief-and-aid-andcare,medicine,aus,indigenous-aboriginal-and-,aborigine-national-aborige,southern-austRALIAMore stories from New South Wales